Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Contraception ; : 110447, 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583583

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Depression is common during pregnancy and the year following childbirth (the perinatal period). This study assessed the association of depressive symptoms and contraception decisions in perinatal individuals. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secondary analysis using data from the PRogram in Support of Moms (PRISM) study, a cluster randomized controlled trial of active interventions which aimed to address perinatal depression. This analysis included 191 individuals aged 18-45 who screened positive for depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS, score ≥10) during pregnancy or up to 3 months postpartum. We assessed contraception intent and method choice at 1-3 months postpartum. At 5-7 months postpartum, we assessed contraceptive method used and EPDS depression scores. We used logistic regressions to examine the relationship between depression and contraceptive use/method. RESULTS: At 1-3 months postpartum, the majority of participants (76.4%) expressed an intention to use contraception. Of those, over half (53.4%) indicated a preference for higher effectiveness contraception methods. Participants with persistent depression symptoms (positive EPDS) at 5-7 months were significantly less likely to report using higher effectiveness contraceptive methods (aOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.11-0.70) compared to those without. Among participants with persistent depressive symptoms, 21.1% reported using a contraception method of lower effectiveness than had originally intended. CONCLUSION: Perinatal individuals with persistent depressive symptoms at 5-7 months postpartum reported greater use of less-effective contraception methods than originally planned. IMPLICATIONS: We found associations between perinatal depression and use of less effective contraception use. Provider discussions regarding contraception planning is important, particularly in those with perinatal depression symptoms.

2.
Matern Child Health J ; 27(9): 1651-1662, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278845

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have elucidated the impact of work-related trauma on labor and delivery clinician or considered whether it may be a cause of burnout. This study aims to elicit labor and delivery clinician perspectives on the impact of exposure to traumatic births on their professional quality of life. METHODS: Labor and delivery clinicians (physicians, midwives, nurse practitioners, and nurses; n = 165) were recruited to complete an online questionnaire on experiences with traumatic births. The questionnaire contained measures from the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the professional quality of life scale version 5. Some participants completed an optional free-text prompt to recommend ways to support clinicians after traumatic births (n = 115). Others opted into a semi-structured phone interview (n = 8). Qualitative data was analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Self-reported adequate institutional support for clinicians after a traumatic birth was positively correlated with compassion satisfaction (r = 0.21, p < 0.01) and negatively correlated with secondary traumatic stress (r = - 0.27, p < 0.01), and burnout (r = - 0.26, p < 0.01). Qualitative themes included lack of system-wide and leadership support, lack of access to mental health resources, and suboptimal workplace culture as contributors toward secondary traumatic stress and burnout. Participants recommended proactive leadership, consistent debriefing protocols, trauma education, and improved access to counseling. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Multi-level barriers prevented labor and delivery clinicians from accessing needed mental health support after exposure to traumatic births. Proactive investment in healthcare system supports for clinicians may improve clinician professional quality of life.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , Compassion Fatigue , Labor, Obstetric , Midwifery , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Compassion Fatigue/etiology , Compassion Fatigue/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Burnout, Professional/complications , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Job Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 26(3): 401-410, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37188798

ABSTRACT

Perinatal mood disorders (PMDs) are common, yet many patients are undertreated. The Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program (MCPAP) for Moms is designed to increase clinicians' willingness to address PMDs. We examined utilization of MCPAP for Moms and associations with PMDs treatment, including the more complex bipolar disorder (BD). Analyses of MCPAP for Moms data examined utilization from 7/2014 to 6/2020 and associated treatment outcomes. Participants were clinicians (n = 1006) in obstetrics/gynecology, family medicine, and pediatrics. Encounters included (1) resource and referrals and (2) psychiatric consultations (program psychiatrist consultation with clinicians or patients). Utilization sub-groups were identified using group-based trajectory modeling. Higher utilization of MCPAP for Moms was associated with increased rates of treating PMDs (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.06-1.07). Examining by encounter type, psychiatric consultations resulted in more frequent rates of clinicians treating PMDs than resource and referral encounters. Utilization of direct patient consultation was associated with the greatest increase in rates of clinicians treating BD (IRR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.82-2.41). Clinicians with highest utilization rates of psychiatric consultations longitudinally had strongest predictive associations with providing direct mental healthcare to patients with BD (IRR = 13.5, 95% CI: 4.2-43.2). Utilization of MCPAP for Moms facilitates clinicians' ability to provide mental health treatment to patients.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Child Psychiatry , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Child , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Depression , Parturition , Massachusetts
5.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 83(5)2022 07 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35830616

ABSTRACT

Objective: To estimate overall prevalence of bipolar disorder (BD) and the prevalence and timing of bipolar-spectrum mood episodes in perinatal women.Data Sources: Databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, ClincalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to March 2020.Study Selection: Included studies were original research in English that had (1) populations of perinatal participants (pregnant or within 12 months postpartum), aged ≥ 18 years, and (2) a screening/diagnostic tool for BD. Search terms described the population (eg, perinatal), illness (eg, bipolar disorder), and detection (eg, screen, identify).Data Extraction: Study design data, rates, and timing of positive screens/diagnoses and mood episodes were extracted by 3 independent reviewers. Pooled prevalences were estimated using random-effects meta-analyses.Results: Twenty-two articles were included in qualitative review and 12 in the meta-analysis. In women with no known psychiatric illness preceding the perinatal period, pooled prevalence of BD was 2.6% (95% CI, 1.2%-4.5%) and prevalence of bipolar-spectrum mood episodes (including depressed, hypomanic/manic, mixed) during pregnancy and the postpartum period was 20.1% (95% CI, 16.0%-24.5%). In women with a prior BD diagnosis, 54.9% (95% CI, 39.2%-70.2%) were found to have at least one bipolar-spectrum mood episode occurrence in the perinatal period.Conclusions: Our review suggests that the perinatal period is associated with high rates of bipolar-spectrum mood episodes and that pregnant and postpartum women represent a special risk population. This review may help to inform clinical care recommendations, thus helping to identify those who may have.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Affect , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Postpartum Period/psychology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Risk Factors
6.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 77: 130-140, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35640435

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs have emerged to help obstetric professionals meet the needs of perinatal individuals with mental health conditions, including bipolar disorder (BD). We elucidate obstetric professionals' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to managing BD in perinatal patients, and how Access Programs may affect these processes. METHODS: We conducted three focus groups with obstetric professionals, two with- and one without-exposure to an Access Program, the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program (MCPAP) for Moms. Focus groups discussed experiences, barriers, facilitators, and solutions to caring for perinatal individuals with BD. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed by two independent coders; emergent themes were examined across exposure groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one obstetric professionals (7 without-exposure, 24 with-exposure) participated. Identified themes included: (1) gaps in perinatal BD education; (2) challenges in patient assessment; (3) MCPAP for Moms as a facilitator for addressing BD; and (4) importance of continued outreach and destigmaization to increase care collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to obstetric professionals accessing adequate mental healthcare for their patients with BD abound. With psychiatric supports in place, it is possible to build obstetric professionals' capacity to address BD. Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs can facilitate obstetric professionals bridging these gaps in mental health care.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Child Psychiatry , Pregnancy Complications , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Child , Female , Humans , Massachusetts , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Qualitative Research
7.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 31(6): 787-807, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35442804

ABSTRACT

Background: Breastfeeding has many positive effects on the health of infants and mothers, however, the effect of breastfeeding on maternal mental health is largely unknown. The goal of this systematic review was to (1) synthesize the existing literature on the effects of breastfeeding on maternal mental health, and (2) inform breastfeeding recommendations. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in electronic databases using search terms related to breastfeeding (e.g., breastfeeding, infant feeding practices) and mental health conditions (e.g., mental illness, anxiety, depression), resulting in 1,110 records. After reviewing article titles and abstracts, 339 articles were advanced to full-text review. Fifty-five articles were included in the final analysis. Results: Thirty-six studies reported significant relationships between breastfeeding and maternal mental health outcomes, namely symptoms of postpartum depression and anxiety: 29 found that breastfeeding is associated with fewer mental health symptoms, one found it was associated with more, and six reported a mixed association between breastfeeding and mental health. Five studies found that breastfeeding challenges were associated with a higher risk of negative mental health symptoms. Conclusions: Overall, breastfeeding was associated with improved maternal mental health outcomes. However, with challenges or a discordance between breastfeeding expectations and actual experience, breastfeeding was associated with negative mental health outcomes. Breastfeeding recommendations should be individualized to take this into account. Further research, specifically examining the breastfeeding experiences of women who experienced mental health conditions, is warranted to help clinicians better personalize breastfeeding and mental health counseling.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Depression, Postpartum , Anxiety/epidemiology , Breast Feeding/psychology , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Depression, Postpartum/psychology , Female , Humans , Infant , Mental Health , Mothers/psychology
8.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol ; 43(3): 368-373, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34533425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Upwards of one in seven individuals experience perinatal depression and many individuals cannot access treatment. In response, perinatal depression is increasingly being managed in the obstetric setting. This study aimed to characterize the experiences of clinicians and clinician assistants to inform the extent to which clinician assistants can help address depression in obstetric settings. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis used data from an ongoing cluster randomized control trial: The PRogram In Support of Moms (PRISM). Participants included clinicians (physicians, certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners) and clinician assistants (medical assistants, nursing assistants). Baseline data regarding practices and attitudes of clinicians and clinician assistants toward addressing depression in the obstetric setting were described. Logistic regressions were used to examine the association of clinician time to complete work and depression management. RESULTS: Clinician assistants experienced significantly fewer time constraints than did clinicians. However, having adequate time to complete work was not significantly associated with increased depression management in clinicians. Clinician assistants reported feeling that addressing depression is an important part of their job, despite variation in doing so. CONCLUSION: Clinician assistants are interacting with perinatal women extensively and are a vital part of obstetric care workflows. Clinician assistants report that they want to address depression and have time to do so. Thus, clinician assistants may be poised to help address the mental health needs of perinatal individuals.


Subject(s)
Depression , Depressive Disorder , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/therapy , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Female , Humans , Mental Health , Pregnancy
9.
Med Care ; 60(2): 106-112, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34908010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: About 7 million people, 2.8% of US adults, have bipolar disorder (BD). While second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are indicated as acute and maintenance treatments for BD, therapeutic success requires medication adherence and reported nonadherence estimates to range as high as 60%. Identifying patient risk factors for nonadherence is important for reducing it. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the associations of risk factors, including social determinants of health, with SGA nonadherence among patients with BD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of 2015-2017 MassHealth Medicaid data, we examined several definitions of adherence and used logistic regression to identify risk factors for nonadherence (medication possession ratio <0.8) among all adults aged 18-64 diagnosed with BD who could be followed for 12 months following SGA initiation. RESULTS: Among 5197 patients, the mean (±SD) age was 37.7 (±11.4) years, and 42.3% were men. Almost half (47.7%) of patients were nonadherent to SGAs when measured by medication possession ratio. The prevalence of nonadherence peaked at middle age for men and younger for women. Nonadherence was less common among Massachusetts' Department of Mental Health clients (odds ratio=0.60, 95% confidence limit: 0.48-0.74) and among those who used other psychotropic medications (odds ratios between 0.45 and 0.81); in contrast, increase in neighborhood socioeconomic stress was associated with increased odds of nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Adherence to SGA treatment is suboptimal among people with BD. Recognizing risk factors, including those related to social determinants of health, can help target interventions to improve adherence for people at high risk and has implications for adherence-based quality measures.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Young Adult
10.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 73: 46-53, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34583284

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To elicit the perspectives of individuals with a traumatic birth experience on barriers and facilitators to receiving mental health support in the postpartum period. METHODS: Individuals who experienced a traumatic birth within the last three years (n = 32) completed semi-structured phone interviews about their birth and postpartum experience. The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-V (PCL-5), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) were administered. Qualitative data was analyzed using a modified grounded theory by three independent coders. RESULTS: Among participants, 34.4% screened positive for PTSD, 18.8% for depression, and 34.4% for anxiety. Participants described multi-level barriers that prevented clinicians from recognizing and supporting patients' postpartum mental health needs; those involved lack of communication, education, and resources. Recommendations from participants included that 1) obstetric professionals should acknowledge birth-related trauma experienced by any individual, 2) providers of multiple disciplines need to be integrated into postpartum care, and 3) mental health support may be needed before the ambulatory postpartum visit. CONCLUSIONS: There are multi-level barriers towards detecting and responding to individuals' mental health needs after a traumatic birth. Obstetric professionals need to use a trauma-informed approach and proactively assess mental health throughout the postpartum period.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health , Postpartum Period/psychology , Pregnancy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy
11.
Psychiatry Res ; 302: 114032, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34111739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Perinatal depression is a common pregnancy complication and universal screening is recommended. The Practice Readiness to Evaluate and address Perinatal Depression (PREPD) was developed to measure obstetric practice readiness to integrate depression care into workflows. Objectives were to describe: (1) the PREPD; (2) associated characteristics by readiness level; and (3) use of the assessment to measure change. METHOD: The PREPD has four components, each scored to a 16-point maximum: (1) Environmental Scan (10% of PREPD); (2) Depression Detection, Assessment, and Treatment Questionnaire (30%); (3) Depression-related Policies Questionnaire (10%); and (4) Chart Abstraction (50%). Components were weighted and summed for an overall score. Summary and component scores were calculated by patient, practice, and provider. RESULTS: Average overall PREPD score was 7.3/16 (range: 4.8-9.9); scores varied between practices. The Environmental Scan averaged 2.0/16 (range: 0-5.2); Detection, Assessment, and Treatment averaged 8.3/16 (range: 3.0-11.5); Chart Abstraction averaged 7.2/16 (range: 5.1-9.6); and Depression-related Policies averaged 10.4/16 (range: 7.5-15). CONCLUSION: We found wide variation in obstetric practices' readiness to implement interventions for depression; most were minimally prepared. These data may be used to tailor practice intervention goals and as benchmarks with which to measure changes in integration of depression care over time.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum , Depressive Disorder , Pregnancy Complications , Delivery of Health Care , Depression/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis
12.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 30(10): 1386-1394, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33835884

ABSTRACT

Background: Perinatal depression is common, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Obstetric providers often do not receive training in perinatal depression, despite being the frontline providers for perinatal individuals. The objective of this study was to develop and pilot test an online training module to assess feasibility, efficacy, and acceptance in improving obstetric providers' knowledge, skills, and practices regarding perinatal depression. Materials and Methods: We designed, developed, and implemented an online, asynchronous, interactive educational module that trains obstetric providers to: (1) know the prevalence and impact of perinatal depression; (2) use validated tools for depression screening; (3) assess for depression; and (4) start and/or refer for treatment. Formative evaluation with five providers, iterative module and question refinement, and a pilot test with pre- and post-test knowledge and self-efficacy questions were conducted. Results: Sixteen obstetric providers averaged a 32% improvement in their pre- to post-test scores (p < 0.01). The average pretest score was 49% (range 20%-70%), and the average post-test score was 81% (range 70%-95%). Provider beliefs (p = 0.01), self-efficacy (p < 0.01), and confidence (p < 0.01) in treating perinatal depression were also significantly increased between pre- and post-test. Average Likert scores on overall training satisfaction were very high post-training completion (4.44 out of 5, with 5 being most positive). Conclusions: The module was feasible and effective at improving provider knowledge of perinatal depression, self-rated confidence, and self-efficacy. Improving the knowledge and skills of obstetric providers regarding depression is a critical part of any intervention aimed to close gaps in care and help ensure that patients receive optimal treatment.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder , Education, Distance , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Self Efficacy
13.
J Psychiatr Res ; 137: 126-130, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33677216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected mental health and created barriers to healthcare. In this study, we sought to elucidate the pandemic's effects on mental health and access to care for perinatal individuals. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of individuals in Massachusetts who were pregnant or up to three months postpartum with a history of depressive symptoms examined associations between demographics and psychiatric symptoms (via validated mental health screening instruments) and the COVID-19 pandemic's effects on mental health and access to care. Chi-square associations and multivariate regression models were used. RESULTS: Of 163 participants, 80.8% perceived increased symptoms of depression and 88.8% of anxiety due to the pandemic. Positive screens for depression, anxiety, and/or PTSD at time of interview, higher education, and income were associated with increased symptoms of depression and anxiety due to the pandemic. Positive screens for depression, anxiety, and/or PTSD were also associated with perceived changes in access to mental healthcare. Compared to non-Hispanic White participants, participants of color (Black, Asian, Multiracial, and/or Hispanic/Latinx) were more likely to report that the pandemic changed their mental healthcare access (aOR:3.25, 95%CI:1.23, 8.59). LIMITATIONS: Limitations included study generalizability, given that participants have a history of depressive symptoms, and cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has increased symptoms of perinatal depression and anxiety and impacted perceived access to care. Self-reported increases in depression and anxiety and changes to healthcare access varied by education, race/ethnicity, income, and positive screens. Understanding these differences is important to address perinatal mental health and provide equitable care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Perinatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/therapy , Female , Humans , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Pregnancy
14.
Curr Epidemiol Rep ; 8(2): 63-71, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33747713

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: COVID-19 is a major concern for the health and wellbeing of individuals worldwide. As COVID-19 cases and deaths continue to increase in the USA, aging Black and Hispanic populations have emerged as especially at-risk for increased exposure to COVID-19 and susceptibility to severe health outcomes. The current review discusses the weathering hypothesis and the influence of social inequality on the identified health disparities. RECENT FINDINGS: Aging minoritized populations have endured structural and social inequality over the lifecourse. Consequently, these populations experience weathering, a process that results in physiological dysregulation due to stress associated with persistent disadvantage. Through weathering and continued inequity, aging minoritized populations have an increased risk of exposure and poor health outcomes from COVID-19. SUMMARY: Current literature and available data suggests that aging minoritized persons experience high rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. The current review hypothesizes and supports that observed disparities are the result of inequalities that especially affect Black and Hispanic populations over the lifecourse. Future efforts to address these disparities should emphasize research that supports governments in identifying at-risk groups, providing accessible COVID-19-related information to those groups, and implementing policy that addresses the structural and social inequities that perpetuate current COVID-19 disparities.

15.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 22(11): 62, 2020 09 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32936340

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objective of this review is to describe the extent to which (1) obstetric settings are currently screening for mental health and substance use disorders and social determinants of health (SDoH), and (2) screening is followed by systematic approaches for ensuring an adequate response to positive screens. Additionally, clinical and policy implications of current screening practices and recommendations are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Screening for perinatal depression in obstetric settings has increased. Despite their prevalence and negative impact, screening for other mental health and substance use disorders and SDoH is much less common and professional society recommendations are either nonexistent, less consistent, or less prescriptive. To truly address maternal mental health, we need to move beyond focusing solely on depression and address other mental health and substance use disorders and the contextual social determinants in which they occur.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder , Mental Disorders , Substance-Related Disorders , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
16.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 29(7): 944-951, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077784

ABSTRACT

Background: Individuals with depression have increased nonpsychiatric health care utilization. Associations between depression and utilization have not been studied in perinatal women, despite their heightened depression risk. We examined patterns of nonpsychiatric health care utilization by symptoms of perinatal depression, expecting more frequent use of acute services while being less likely to have routine medical care. Materials and Methods: We identified 1,103 perinatal participants from the 2005 to 2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. The Patient Health Questionnaire was used to identify depression (score ≥10). We evaluated associations between perinatal depressive symptoms and health care utilization using logistic models and relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) using adjusted models with appropriate weighting to provide national estimates. Results: Among perinatal U.S. women, 7.3% had depressive symptoms. Relative to those without these symptoms, women experiencing depressive symptoms were younger, more impoverished, and uninsured (p < 0.05). Women with depressive symptoms, compared with those without them, had twice the odds of being without routine medical care (21.6% vs. 12.5%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 4.1) and of using urgent care more frequently (26.5% vs. 15.1%, aOR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.0 to 3.9). Depressive symptoms combined with lack of insurance generally increased the odds of not having routine care (RERI: 8.4, 95% CI: -0.5 to 17.3) and more frequent use of urgent care (RERI: 7.1, 95% CI: -2.7 to 17.0). Conclusions: Perinatal depression is a prevalent, high-risk illness that requires more nonpsychiatric services and increased psychiatric care. Approaches that facilitate establishing a place for routine care and decreasing acute care use are necessary.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum/etiology , Depression/psychology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mothers/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Perinatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Depression, Postpartum/psychology , Female , Humans , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postnatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
17.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 61: 53-59, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31710859

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Bipolar disorder affects 2-8% of pregnant and postpartum women; untreated illness is associated with poor outcomes. This study aimed to describe bipolar disorder screening rates in obstetric settings and associated characteristics. METHOD: Women were recruited during pregnancy through three months postpartum from 14 obstetric clinics in Massachusetts. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) was used to screen for bipolar disorder; a subset previously diagnosed with bipolar was also examined. Differences in characteristics by screening outcome were tested using chi-square and t-tests. RESULTS: Of 574 participating women, 18.8% screened positive for bipolar disorder. Compared to those with negative, those with positive bipolar screens had 18.5-times the prevalence of positive substance use screens (11.1% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and 3.4-times reported feeling they were not receiving adequate psychiatric help (24.0 vs. 7.0%, p < 0.001). Less than half of those with positive bipolar screens (42.0%) and 61.3% with pre-existing bipolar reported receiving current psychiatric care. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one in five perinatal women screened positive for bipolar disorder. Positive screenings were associated with comorbid substance use and low treatment rates. This study highlights the importance of screening for bipolar disorder during the perinatal period and the need for systematic approaches to ensure adequate assessment and follow-up. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02760004.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Hospitals, Maternity/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Puerperal Disorders/diagnosis , Puerperal Disorders/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 256, 2019 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331292

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression, the most common pregnancy complication, is associated with negative maternal-offspring outcomes. Despite existence of effective treatments, it is under-recognized and under-treated. Professional organizations recommend universal screening, yet multi-level barriers exist to ensuring effective diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Integrating mental health and obstetric care holds significant promise for addressing perinatal depression. The overall study goal is to compare the effectiveness of two active interventions: (1) the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program (MCPAP) for Moms, a state-wide, population-based program, and (2) the PRogram In Support of Moms (PRISM) which includes MCPAP for Moms plus a proactive, multifaceted, practice-level intervention with intensive implementation support. METHODS: This study is conducted in two phases: (1) a run-in phase which has been completed and involved practice and patient participant recruitment to demonstrate feasibility for the second phase, and (2) a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT), which is ongoing, and will compare two active interventions 1:1 with ten Ob/Gyn practices as the unit of randomization. In phase 1, rates of depressive symptoms and other demographic and clinical features among patients were examined to inform practice randomization. Patient participants to be recruited in phase 2 will be followed longitudinally until 13 months postpartum; they will have 3-5 total study visits depending on whether their initial recruitment and interview was at 4-24 or 32-40 weeks gestation, or 1-3 months postpartum. Sampling throughout pregnancy and postpartum will ensure participants with different depressive symptom onset times. Differences in depression symptomatology and treatment participation will be compared between patient participants by intervention arm. DISCUSSION: This manuscript describes the full two-phase study protocol. The study design is innovative because it combines effectiveness with implementation research designs and integrates critical components of participatory action research. Our approach assesses the feasibility, acceptance, efficacy, and sustainability of integrating a stepped-care approach to perinatal depression care into ambulatory obstetric settings; an approach that is flexible and can be tailored and adapted to fit unique workflows of real-world practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02760004, registered prospectively on May 3, 2016.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum , Depression , Perinatal Care/methods , Pregnancy Complications , Psychological Techniques , Psychosocial Support Systems , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/etiology , Depression/therapy , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/therapy , Female , Humans , Mental Health , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Participation , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Research Design
20.
J Affect Disord ; 217: 205-209, 2017 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28415008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI), we previously compared cohorts of bipolar I subjects in a manic state to those in a euthymic state to identify mood state-specific patterns of cortico-amygdala connectivity. Our results suggested that mania is reflected in the disruption of emotion regulation circuits. We sought to replicate this finding in a group of subjects with bipolar disorder imaged longitudinally across states of mania and euthymia METHODS: We divided our subjects into three groups: 26 subjects imaged in a manic state, 21 subjects imaged in a euthymic state, and 10 subjects imaged longitudinally across both mood states. We measured differences in amygdala connectivity between the mania and euthymia cohorts. We then used these regions of altered connectivity to examine connectivity in the longitudinal bipolar group using a within-subjects design. RESULTS: Our findings in the mania vs euthymia cohort comparison were replicated in the longitudinal analysis. Bipolar mania was differentiated from euthymia by decreased connectivity between the amygdala and pre-genual anterior cingulate cortex. Mania was also characterized by increased connectivity between amygdala and the supplemental motor area, a region normally anti-correlated to the amygdala in emotion regulation tasks. LIMITATIONS: Stringent controls for movement effects limited the number of subjects in the longitudinal sample. CONCLUSIONS: In this first report of rsfMRI conducted longitudinally across mood states, we find that previously observed between-group differences in amygdala connectivity are also found longitudinally within subjects. These results suggest resting state cortico-amygdala connectivity is a biomarker of mood state in bipolar disorder.


Subject(s)
Amygdala/physiopathology , Bipolar Disorder/physiopathology , Gyrus Cinguli/physiopathology , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Brain Mapping , Cohort Studies , Cyclothymic Disorder/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...